I’m preparing a post now on my recent David O. Selznick weekend, but before I get to that, an intriguing mystery has come up.
Here is a photograph I picked up two days ago in an antique shop in Ashland, Oregon. The proprietor of the shop wasn’t able to tell me any more about it than I was able to deduce from looking at it — in fact, much of what he told me was at a variance from what I did deduce.
In the bottom left corner of the photo is a handwritten inscription:
To my dear friend
On the back the photo is stamped, in letters ranging from one-quarter inch to one inch high:
PRICE STUDIOS, INC.
SALMON TOWER BLDG.
11 WEST 42nd ST.
TELEPHONE — PENN. 1780
Above the stamp is handwritten in pencil: “Larchmont Yacht Club 1930”. Next to the date, also in pencil but sideways, is the number “13” in a circle.
The shop owner asserted that the signature reads “John Berryman”, but it clearly says “John Barrymore”. I got the distinct impression that the name John Barrymore meant absolutely nothing to him.
I was able to find online several examples of John Barrymore’s autograph, and it must be admitted that most of them bear only a slight resemblance to the signature on the photo. However, most of them appear to have been scrawled in haste, no doubt as Barrymore was accosted on the street or in a restaurant and asked to sign someone’s autograph book; the photo, on the other hand, appears to have been inscribed at leisure and with some care. Personally, I’m satisfied that this is an authentic John Barrymore autograph — because I’m satisfied that the man in the photo is John Barrymore himself. Grotesquely made up, granted, but still easily recognizable.
The shop owner had the photo labeled “Vaudeville Photo 1920’s” and said it was of two vaudevillians in their stage costumes. I disagree. To me, there can be no doubt that the photo was taken at a costume party at the famous Larchmont Yacht Club in Westchester County, NY sometime during 1930 — Halloween, perhaps.
As for the inscription to “my dear friend Sadie Thompson” — well, that can only refer to the central character in Rain, the play by John Colton and Clemence Randolph based on W. Somerset Maugham’s story “Miss Thompson”; the idea that Barrymore, or anybody else for that matter, actually knew somebody by that name is patently far-fetched. It’s far more likely that this is a playful inscription to an actress who had played Sadie Thompson. By 1930 there were only two such actresses. The first was Jeanne Eagels, who created the role on Broadway in 1922, toured with the show for two years, then returned with it to Broadway for another run of a year and a half. But Jeanne Eagels died in October 1929; obviously the photo was not inscribed to her. That leaves Gloria Swanson, who starred in the 1928 silent picture Sadie Thompson. Was this photo a gift from Barrymore to his “dear friend” Gloria? Or did he have some other “dear friend” whom he identified with Maugham’s notorious good-time gal as a private joke?
And the final mystery: Who is the woman in the picture? It’s not Dolores Costello, to whom Barrymore was married in 1930. Nor is it Gloria Swanson, America’s only living Sadie Thompson.
Does anybody have any ideas? Comments and speculations are welcome.
Update 10/11/14, 11:05 pm:
Today I received this picture from historian Richard M. Roberts, who states conclusively — and I’m convinced — that my picture isn’t John Barrymore after all. Richard’s message:
I saw your Cinedrome blog today about your alleged
Barrymore pic and I am really going to hate to be the bearer of bad news here,
but it is not a picture of John Barrymore, nor of his autograph.
Attached is a copy of a carefully inscribed and
autographed picture of John Barrymore, a good sample of the actor’s actual
signature, and you will see that the signature and handwriting on your picture
is nothing like it. Barrymore’s script was much more flamboyant, he was both an
actor and an artist (as in sketching) don’t forget. The fellow in your picture
also has a much longer and slimmer neck than Barrymore, nor are the eyes and
The inscription is obviously meant to be ironic and
sarcastic in a friendly way, meant to imply that the woman is being saucier
than she actually is, and that the man is a more important actor than he is,
but neither name is meant to be the actual names of the people involved. They
most likely are two vaudevillians, probably husband and wife, but I have no
idea who they actually are.
Hope you are well, I always enjoy your blog and look
forward to seeing you at Cinevent next year.
Many thanks for getting in touch, Richard; I had a hunch — no, I knew
— you’d be able to shed light on the subject. Now that I compare the pictures directly, I can see that the ears are wrong too.
The picture remains a mystery, of course: Who are these people, and what — if anything — did they have to do with the Larchmont Yacht Club? Maybe New York socialites slumming as showbiz types for a party at the club?
Speculations remain welcome…